Harry Potter “Deathly Hallows” part two
31 07 2007I finished the book over the past weekend and let me just say that I absolutely Loved the book and J.K. Rowling is a freaking genius.
I am more than satisfied with the ending, I though she was going to finish him off, kill Harry Potter. But instead she selectively chose certain people that she knew would affect us so. I am sad that we weren’t able to see Harry jump on a broom at all this final book! Hello, I mean he could have used one of his strengths, but instead this book seemed to draw upon all heart! I am sad that this is the final, the end but we all knew it had to come some day! Seven books dude! Wow! How many of us can actually write just one?!
However, there are some that are not Potterheads like us who laugh at us and jeer their sarcasm, and do not be afraid in knowing that they wish they could have jumped onto our journey but sadly simply do not because they rather read non-fiction (yuk) or just cannot comprehend that there may be a magical world out there waiting for us, or may just be afraid of being unafraid and being obsessed with this world the way we have.
J. K. Rowling has done that for us. Many of us who have latched onto her books that are familiar with Greek Mythology, Lord of the Rings, and ya know Wrinkle in Time know where her influences have stemmed from. But its okay! We are stoked that she was able to come up with such a brilliant masterpiece that people will forever enjoy and pass down to our future generations! If anyone intends to throw a Birthday party for me, it would be so cool for the theme to be 80’s or Harry Potter because that’s how much I’d get down with the whole idea of doing something cool like this and seeing how people would interpret either.
I think the Hallows was a genius idea and she was able to just freaking flow with that idea of hers. I thought the stone was the sorcer’s stone, I don’t see why she didn’t see fit to use that here, but whatever the case. It was awesome to see how Nagini had a much more important role that I had suspected. I am so bummed out that Fred died, dude why? Even Lupin and Tonks. What was that going to do for me? Why was that neccessary? Were we supposed to see the correlation between their child and Neville? I knew in my gut that Snape arranged something with Dumbledore. And I thought it was so endearing that Snape loved Harry’s mommy. It made sense and I suspected that from the fifth book.
Well, ya’all would like to have a seminar on the shoutout box, lemme know if you are game! I did love this book and can’t believe its finished! See you all soon!!!!!!
M.
Written by Mailani - Visit Website
greetings people of mighty j land.... i come in peace. i've come to BREAK the SILENCE in this SHOUTBOX!!!!!!! Hope all is well where you are! 
it's friday!!!!!!
[...] Zac Efron Contact the Webmaster Link to Article harry potter Harry Potter “Deathly Hallows” part two » Posted at M i g h t y J on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 I finished the book over the past weekend and let me just say that I absolutely Loved the book and J.K. Rowling is a freaking genius … be so cool for the theme to be 80’s or Harry Potter because that’s how much I’d get down … . I am more than satisfied with the ending, I though she was going to finish him off, kill Harry View Original Article » [...]
Remus had to die because he was the last friend of James and Lily’s who was still alive. That connection with the past had to be eliminated. Now Remus and Tonks’s son will grow up as Harry did; the difference being that their son will be adopted by his godfather Harry, as Harry was to be adopted by his godfather Sirius.
The Sorcerer’s (or Philosopher’s) stone was supposed to have been destroyed by Nicholas Flammel at the end of the first book. If the Sorcerer’s stone was actually the third Deathly Hallow, then Dumbledore would have been in possession of all three Deathly Hallows in the beginning of the series (the wand, the cloak, and the stone). And if Dumbledore had possessed all three, then he might have easily destroyed Voldermort (if the legend was correct) and thus Voldermort could’ve been completely destroyed in the first book.